Peru’s Supreme Court Sentences Ex-President Castillo to Over 11 Years
Source: Peru’s Supreme Court sentences former President Pedro Castillo to over 11 years in prison for failed 2022... (2025-11-29)
In a landmark ruling, Peru’s Supreme Court has sentenced former President Pedro Castillo to over 11 years in prison for his failed 2022 self-coup attempt, marking a significant moment in Latin American political accountability. The court’s decision underscores the ongoing efforts to uphold democratic institutions amid political turmoil in Peru. Castillo’s attempt to dissolve Congress on December 7, 2022, was widely condemned as an unconstitutional power grab, leading to his arrest and subsequent legal proceedings. The court also ordered Castillo’s former ministers, Betssy Chávez and Aníbal Torres, to pay civil reparations totaling approximately US$3.1 million to the Peruvian state, emphasizing the judiciary’s stance against attempts to undermine constitutional order. This ruling is part of a broader trend of judicial actions against political leaders involved in unconstitutional acts across Latin America, reflecting a regional commitment to strengthening democratic governance. Notably, the case highlights the importance of judicial independence in Peru, which has faced political instability and protests in recent years. The sentencing also comes amid heightened diplomatic tensions, as Peru recently broke diplomatic relations with Mexico after granting asylum to Betssy Chávez, Castillo’s former prime minister. This move signals Peru’s firm stance on maintaining sovereignty and accountability for actions perceived as threats to constitutional stability. Recent developments in Peru’s political landscape include the following facts: 1. The Peruvian Congress has been under pressure to implement reforms to prevent future executive overreach. 2. The country has experienced multiple protests demanding justice and transparency following Castillo’s ousting. 3. The Peruvian judiciary has increased its scrutiny of political figures involved in corruption and unconstitutional acts. 4. Peru’s government is actively engaging with international organizations to bolster democratic institutions and rule of law. 5. The diplomatic fallout with Mexico over the asylum issue has led to a temporary suspension of diplomatic ties, with potential for future negotiations. This case exemplifies Peru’s ongoing struggle to balance political stability with judicial accountability. Castillo’s calm demeanor during sentencing reflects a complex political climate where justice is increasingly asserting itself against attempts to undermine constitutional order. As the country moves forward, the implications of this ruling are expected to influence future political and judicial reforms, reinforcing the importance of adherence to democratic principles in Latin America. The case also serves as a reminder of the region’s broader challenges with political polarization, corruption, and the need for resilient institutions to safeguard democracy.