AIWorldNewz.com

AI as Fake Therapists: Experts Warn of Growing Mental Health Risks

Source: Jon Hernández, AI expert: “If you know someone who uses AI as a psychologist for real problems, take their pho (2025-11-21)

In a recent warning that underscores the urgent need for responsible AI use, tech communicator Jon Hernández cautions against relying on artificial intelligence as a substitute for professional mental health support. Hernández emphasizes that AI tools are fundamentally incapable of providing genuine psychological care and warns that treating AI as a therapist can be dangerous. His concerns are rooted in recent trends showing a dramatic shift in AI usage from research and learning in 2024 to emotional support in 2025, with millions turning to AI for mental health assistance. This alarming trend raises critical questions about the safety and efficacy of AI-driven emotional support, especially as AI lacks the empathy, ethical judgment, and nuanced understanding necessary for mental health treatment. Recent data from 2025 reveals that over 60% of AI interactions now involve emotional support, a significant increase from previous years, with many users reporting feelings of loneliness and dependency on AI companions. Experts warn that AI cannot replace trained psychologists, as it cannot truly understand human emotions or provide personalized, ethical care. The risks include misdiagnosis, emotional dependency, and the potential for AI to reinforce harmful behaviors or misinformation. Additionally, mental health professionals are raising concerns about the lack of regulation and oversight in AI-driven emotional support platforms, which often operate without clinical standards. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that AI's inability to process complex human emotions can lead to misunderstandings, potentially exacerbating mental health issues. The rise of AI therapists also raises privacy concerns, as sensitive personal data may be vulnerable to breaches or misuse. Governments and health authorities are now calling for stricter regulations and public awareness campaigns to prevent misuse of AI in mental health contexts. Meanwhile, technology companies are urged to implement safeguards, including clear disclaimers and limits on AI's role in emotional support. In light of these developments, experts recommend that individuals seek help from licensed mental health professionals rather than AI tools. They also advocate for increased education about the limitations of AI in mental health care and the importance of human empathy in therapy. As AI continues to evolve rapidly, it is crucial for users, developers, and policymakers to collaborate on establishing ethical standards that prioritize safety and well-being. The future of mental health support must balance technological innovation with responsible use, ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces human care. In conclusion, while AI offers promising applications across many fields, its role in mental health support remains highly controversial and potentially risky. The recent surge in AI-based emotional support highlights the need for caution, regulation, and ongoing research to safeguard vulnerable populations. As Hernández warns, treating AI as a psychologist is not only misguided but could have serious consequences for mental health and safety. Moving forward, a collaborative effort among technologists, clinicians, and regulators is essential to harness AI's benefits responsibly, ensuring it serves as a helpful tool rather than a dangerous substitute for human compassion and expertise.

More recent coverage